SVF I.107
- Stoic
- Zeno of Citium
- Ancient source
- Stobaeus, Eclogae, Book I (Arius Didymus fr. phys. 36), with Eusebius PE XV 18,2 — Ecl. I 20,1e p. 171,2 W.
- Source language
- Ancient Greek
- Source status
- Testimonium
Original — Ancient Greek
Ζήνωνι καὶ Κλεάνθει καὶ Χρυσίππῳ ἀρέσκει τὴν οὐσίαν μεταβάλλειν οἷον εἰς σπέρμα τὸ πῦρ, καὶ πάλιν ἐκ τούτου τοιαύτην ἀποτελεῖσθαι τὴν διακόσμησιν, οἵα πρότερον ἦν. — Eusebius, PE XV 18,2: ἀρέσκει γὰρ τοῖς Στωικοῖς φιλοσόφοις τὴν ὅλην οὐσίαν εἰς πῦρ μεταβάλλειν οἷον εἰς σπέρμα, καὶ πάλιν ἐκ τούτου αὐτὴν ἀποτελεῖσθαι τὴν διακόσμησιν, οἵα τὸ πρότερον ἦν. καὶ τοῦτο τὸ δόγμα τῶν ἀπὸ τῆς αἱρέσεως οἱ πρῶτοι καὶ πρεσβύτατοι προσήκαντο, Ζήνων τε καὶ Κλεάνθης καὶ Χρύσιππος.StoicOs Translation
Zeno, Cleanthes and Chrysippus hold that substance changes into fire as into a seed, and that out of this again an ordering of the world is brought to completion such as it was before. — Eusebius: For the Stoic philosophers hold that the whole of substance changes into fire as into a seed, and that out of this it is again brought to completion as an ordering of the world such as it was before. And this doctrine was accepted by the first and oldest men of the school, Zeno, Cleanthes and Chrysippus.
Context
The doxography of Arius Didymus records the doctrine of the world-cycle under the names of the first three heads of the Stoa; Eusebius, quoting the same source, stresses that precisely the founders — Zeno first — stood behind it.
Source notes:Text verified against von Arnim, SVF I (1903), no. 107, p. 32 (OCR of the scanned edition; the locus and Diels fragment numbers are partly garbled in the OCR and restored from the edition's conventions). Von Arnim appends Eusebius, PE XV 18,2, which adds that “the first and oldest of the school — Zeno, Cleanthes and Chrysippus — accepted this doctrine”, and Arnobius as a Latin echo.
What the source actually tells us
A double doxographic attestation of the same sentence, with Zeno named first in both. The seed-image (fire as the seed of the next world) links this directly to the seminal-reason cosmogony of SVF I.102 and the conflagration of SVF I.98, and Tatian (SVF I.109) confirms that Zeno drew the consequence of recurrence.
Philosophical meaning
The end of the world is not annihilation but concentration: everything returns into fire as into a seed, and from that seed the same ordered world unfolds again. Destruction and creation are one continuous physiology of the cosmos. This gave the Stoa its deepest ground for trust in providence: the world's order is not fragile — it is the recurring expression of the divine fire's own nature.
Scholarly uncertainty
The doctrine is attributed to Zeno jointly with Cleanthes and Chrysippus; the wording is the doxographer's, and Zeno's specific formulation cannot be isolated from the school's. That Zeno himself taught the fiery cycle is, however, independently supported by SVF I.98 and I.109.
Go deeper
About this edition
StoicOs Ancient Library is a developing multilingual digital study edition of surviving early Stoic material. The Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta assembled by Hans von Arnim provides the traditional reference framework. StoicOs distinguishes carefully between fragments, testimonia, later reports and interpretation. StoicOs translations are prepared from the surviving ancient-language sources where available.